Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMNX
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style N
Price$19.52
Change-$0.35 (-1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.65M
FTHFX vs QSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QSMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QSMNX (151M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QSMNX: FTHFX (0.63) vs QSMNX (0.12). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QSMNX (13 years). QSMNX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QSMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). QSMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QSMNX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. QSMNX (13.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. QSMNX (16.01).
| FTHFX | QSMNX | FTHFX / QSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 7.608 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 151M | 7,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.12 | 532% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 13.83 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 19.56 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 16.01 | 451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 87.59 | 319% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement