Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QSMLX
FTHFX vs QSMLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QSMLX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.19
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.23B
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style I
Price$19.92
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.85M
FTHFX vs QSMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QSMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QSMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. QSMLX (140M). QSMLX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: QSMLX (1.34) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QSMLX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QSMLX (13 years). QSMLX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QSMLX: FTHFX (1000000) vs QSMLX (5000000). QSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.90 vs. FTHFX (-4.44). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.10 vs. QSMLX (41.15).
| FTHFX | QSMLX | FTHFX / QSMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.61 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.74 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.471 | 16.676 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 140M | 8,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.34 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.44 | -3.90 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.81 | 27.54 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.10 | 41.15 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.11 | 63.91 | 268% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement