Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$25.57
Change-$0.44 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. QLSCX (1.34B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs QLSCX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. FTHFX (-1.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. QLSCX (55.83).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -4.661 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 1.34B | 741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.38 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 8.23 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 28.83 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 55.83 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement