Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.51
Change-$0.16 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$27.55
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. QLSCX (1.48B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs QLSCX (0.36). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. FTHFX (2.03). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. QLSCX (60.31).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 2.722 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.48B | 730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.36 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | 7.50 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 34.12 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 60.31 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers