Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.11
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QLSCX (1.57B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs QLSCX (0.31). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. QLSCX (7.21). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. QLSCX (24.30).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 8.538 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.57B | 707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.31 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 7.21 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 51.04 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | 24.30 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement