Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QLSCX
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QLSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.34
Change-$0.82 (-2.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
FTHFX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QLSCX (1.46B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs QLSCX (0.32). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QLSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.05 vs. FTHFX (-6.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.31 vs. QLSCX (50.45).
| FTHFX | QLSCX | FTHFX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.926 | 12.453 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.46B | 759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.32 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | 6.05 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.76 | 42.90 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.31 | 50.45 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers