Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QISCX
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QISCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$29.80
Change+$0.17 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QISCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QISCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. QISCX (1.5B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QISCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs QISCX (0.32). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QISCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and QISCX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QISCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.96 vs. FTHFX (8.53). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. QISCX (66.84).
| FTHFX | QISCX | FTHFX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 11.153 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 1.5B | 752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.32 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 17.96 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 47.02 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 66.84 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 96.87 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement