Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QISCX
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QISCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.36
Change-$0.15 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.74B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$27.28
Change-$0.20 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QISCX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QISCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. QISCX (1.39B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QISCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs QISCX (0.36). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QISCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and QISCX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QISCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. FTHFX (-0.39). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.74 vs. QISCX (54.26).
| FTHFX | QISCX | FTHFX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.271 | 1.753 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 1.39B | 768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.36 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.39 | 5.78 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.80 | 27.77 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.74 | 54.26 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.87 | 73.59 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement