Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QISCX
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QISCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core IS
Price$30.18
Change+$0.29 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FTHFX vs QISCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QISCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QISCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QISCX (1.63B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QISCX: FTHFX (0.65) vs QISCX (0.31). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QISCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QISCX (20 years). QISCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and QISCX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. QISCX (12.15). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.24 vs. QISCX (20.41).
| FTHFX | QISCX | FTHFX / QISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | 5.246 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.63B | 682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 12.15 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 43.39 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.24 | 20.41 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.55 | 161.61 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement