Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QCSCX
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$22.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QCSCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QCSCX (1.57B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs QCSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QCSCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. QCSCX (3.76). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. QCSCX (10.63).
| FTHFX | QCSCX | FTHFX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 5.095 | 277% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.57B | 707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 3.76 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 43.03 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | 10.63 | 717% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 79.43 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement