Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QCSCX
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$22.76
Change-$0.59 (-2.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QCSCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QCSCX (1.65B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FTHFX (0.63) vs QCSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QCSCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. QCSCX (6.80). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. QCSCX (6.90).
| FTHFX | QCSCX | FTHFX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 5.322 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.65B | 673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 6.80 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 28.15 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 6.90 | 1,046% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 118.43 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement