Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QCSCX
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$21.30
Change+$0.23 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
FTHFX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QCSCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. QCSCX (1.43B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs QCSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QCSCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.01 vs. FTHFX (5.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. QCSCX (47.40).
| FTHFX | QCSCX | FTHFX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 1.429 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 1.43B | 748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 15.01 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 31.56 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 47.40 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 47.00 | 323% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement