Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QASCX
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$28.40
Change+$0.16 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QASCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QASCX (1.63B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FTHFX (0.65) vs QASCX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). QASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QASCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.89 vs. QASCX (11.88). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 68.43 vs. QASCX (15.09).
| FTHFX | QASCX | FTHFX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.34 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.636 | 4.670 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.63B | 682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.11 | 619% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.89 | 11.88 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.63 | 41.02 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.43 | 15.09 | 454% |
| Returns for 10 years | 274.34 | 150.69 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement