Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QASCX
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$26.05
Change+$0.28 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QASCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and QASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. QASCX (1.43B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs QASCX (0.13). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QASCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.02 vs. FTHFX (5.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. QASCX (58.64).
| FTHFX | QASCX | FTHFX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 1.837 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 1.43B | 748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.13 | 610% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 16.02 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 35.89 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 58.64 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 67.71 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement