Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QASCX
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$24.36
Change-$0.42 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QASCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and QASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. QASCX (1.34B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs QASCX (0.13). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QASCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.92 vs. FTHFX (-1.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. QASCX (52.60).
| FTHFX | QASCX | FTHFX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -4.769 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 1.34B | 741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.13 | 596% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 7.92 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 27.61 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 52.60 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | 53.59 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement