Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs QASCX
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs QASCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$28.15
Change-$0.20 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
FTHFX vs QASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. QASCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and QASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. QASCX (1.5B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs QASCX (0.11). FTHFX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). QASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: QASCX (1500) vs FTHFX (1000000). QASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. FTHFX (-1.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. QASCX (53.58).
| FTHFX | QASCX | FTHFX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.34 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 10.047 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.5B | 740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.11 | 630% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | 8.78 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 49.81 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 53.58 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 81.35 | 208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement