Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PXSCX
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PXSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Impax Small Cap Investor
Price$18.80
Change-$0.41 (-2.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets726.42M
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PXSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and PXSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PXSCX (726M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than PXSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs PXSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PXSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PXSCX (18 years). PXSCX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PXSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PXSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PXSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PXSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.95 vs. FTHFX (-5.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.83 vs. PXSCX (33.01).
| FTHFX | PXSCX | FTHFX / PXSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 10.529 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 726M | 1,529% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | 0.95 | -564% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 26.88 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.83 | 33.01 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.84 | 46.71 | 370% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement