Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PXSCX
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PXSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Impax Small Cap Investor
Price$17.23
Change+$0.14 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.11M
FTHFX vs PXSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PXSCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PXSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. PXSCX (653M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than PXSCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs PXSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PXSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PXSCX (17 years). PXSCX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PXSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PXSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PXSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PXSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. FTHFX (5.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. PXSCX (37.99).
| FTHFX | PXSCX | FTHFX / PXSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -0.863 | -380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 653M | 1,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 6.89 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 23.34 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 37.99 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 21.83 | 695% |