Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$17.40
Change-$0.28 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.55M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PSCNX (82.5M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than PSCNX: FTHFX (0.63) vs PSCNX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (10 years). PSCNX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. PSCNX (6.16). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. PSCNX (7.07).
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.75 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 6.162 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 82.5M | 13,455% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 6.16 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 18.37 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 7.07 | 1,021% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 103.68 | 270% |