Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$18.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.29M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. PSCNX (70.3M). PSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PSCNX (1.37) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (10 years). PSCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.31 vs. FTHFX (10.03). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 106.62 vs. PSCNX (76.06).
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.590 | 15.067 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 70.3M | 16,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.37 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 28.31 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.87 | 32.04 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.62 | 76.06 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement