Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$16.72
Change+$0.14 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.06M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and PSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. PSCNX (65.1M). PSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PSCNX (1.51) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (10 years). PSCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). PSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.08 vs. FTHFX (5.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. PSCNX (82.70).
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 6.294 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 65.1M | 16,436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.51 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 15.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 36.11 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 82.70 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement