Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PSCNX
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PSCNX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
Price$16.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.53M
FTHFX vs PSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PSCNX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and PSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PSCNX (76.5M). PSCNX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PSCNX (1.39) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PSCNX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PSCNX (10 years). PSCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). PSCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). PSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PSCNX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. PSCNX (4.44). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. PSCNX (14.38).
| FTHFX | PSCNX | FTHFX / PSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | 6.103 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 76.5M | 14,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.39 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 4.44 | 262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 31.25 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | 14.38 | 525% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | 65.83 | 342% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers