Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PRSVX
FTHFX vs PRSVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PRSVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value
Price$55.40
Change-$1.03 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.6B
FTHFX vs PRSVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PRSVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and PRSVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PRSVX (9.6B). PRSVX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: PRSVX (0.79) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PRSVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PRSVX (37 years). PRSVX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. PRSVX (32.40). PRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PRSVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.29 vs. PRSVX (-8.36). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.31 vs. PRSVX (16.42).
| FTHFX | PRSVX | FTHFX / PRSVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.77 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.77 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.926 | 4.944 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 9.6B | 116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.79 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | -8.36 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.76 | 5.83 | 682% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.31 | 16.42 | 507% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.67 | 26.02 | 637% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers