Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs PASVX
FTHFX vs PASVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs PASVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Adv
Price$55.11
Change-$1.04 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.6B
FTHFX vs PASVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. PASVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and PASVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PASVX (9.6B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than PASVX: FTHFX (0.70) vs PASVX (0.32). FTHFX was incepted earlier than PASVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs PASVX (26 years). PASVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. PASVX (32.40). PASVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: PASVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.33 vs. PASVX (-7.57). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.83 vs. PASVX (16.76).
| FTHFX | PASVX | FTHFX / PASVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 6.526 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 9.6B | 116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.32 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -7.57 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 5.45 | 768% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.83 | 16.76 | 518% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.84 | 26.54 | 651% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers