Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWQFX
FTHFX vs NWQFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWQFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value R6
Price$32.26
Change-$0.52 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.05M
FTHFX vs NWQFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWQFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NWQFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. NWQFX (88.1M). NWQFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWQFX (1.56) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWQFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWQFX (9 years). NWQFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NWQFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NWQFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. NWQFX (-2.12). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NWQFX (63.03).
| FTHFX | NWQFX | FTHFX / NWQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.97 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -3.384 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 88.1M | 11,249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.56 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -2.12 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 28.14 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 63.03 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers