Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGSX
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp Instl Svc
Price$23.29
Change-$5.62 (-19.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.49M
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NWGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NWGSX (51.5M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NWGSX: FTHFX (0.63) vs NWGSX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGSX (19 years). NWGSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NWGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.29 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NWGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGSX (50000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. NWGSX (-25.30). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. NWGSX (-16.28).
| FTHFX | NWGSX | FTHFX / NWGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 0.605 | 830% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 51.5M | 21,553% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | -25.30 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | -21.06 | -194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | -16.28 | -444% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | -7.09 | -3,945% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement