Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGSX
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp Instl Svc
Price$23.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.07M
FTHFX vs NWGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NWGSX (73.1M). NWGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGSX (1.02) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGSX (19 years). NWGSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NWGSX (17.79). NWGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGSX (50000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. NWGSX (-24.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. NWGSX (-8.36).
| FTHFX | NWGSX | FTHFX / NWGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | -23.099 | -61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 73.1M | 15,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.02 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -24.11 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | -5.85 | -869% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | -8.36 | -911% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | -18.89 | -1,202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement