Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.70
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$27.50
Change+$0.23 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.86M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NWGPX (92.9M). NWGPX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGPX (0.79) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (19 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.97 vs. NWGPX (-15.15). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.79 vs. NWGPX (14.15).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.625 | -4.613 | -252% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 92.9M | 11,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.79 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.97 | -15.15 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.00 | 5.99 | 668% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.79 | 14.15 | 550% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.48 | -9.73 | -1,762% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement