Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$27.15
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.82M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NWGPX (96.8M). NWGPX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGPX (0.79) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (19 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. NWGPX (-15.46). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. NWGPX (25.85).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | -5.827 | -153% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 96.8M | 11,467% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.79 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -15.46 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 14.87 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 25.85 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | -8.78 | -1,930% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement