Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$21.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.07M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NWGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NWGPX (73.1M). NWGPX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGPX (0.79) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (19 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. NWGPX (-25.94). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. NWGPX (-11.63).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | -24.558 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 73.1M | 15,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.79 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -25.94 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | -8.06 | -631% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | -11.63 | -655% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | -24.91 | -912% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement