Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.16
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$28.26
Change+$0.16 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.9M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NWGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NWGPX (183M). NWGPX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGPX (0.76) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (19 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. NWGPX (-8.14). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. NWGPX (36.63).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | -1.977 | -531% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 183M | 6,175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.76 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | -8.14 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 17.50 | 322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 36.63 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | -3.32 | -5,376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers