Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$25.87
Change-$0.56 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.05M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NWGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. NWGPX (174M). NWGPX (0.82) and FTHFX (0.79) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (18 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. NWGPX (-11.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NWGPX (34.86).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -10.267 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 174M | 5,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.82 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -11.72 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 7.52 | 525% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 34.86 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | -18.69 | -708% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement