Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NWGPX
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NWGPX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp A
Price$27.69
Change-$0.16 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.7M
FTHFX vs NWGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NWGPX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NWGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NWGPX (184M). NWGPX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NWGPX (0.82) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NWGPX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NWGPX (18 years). NWGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NWGPX (17.79). NWGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NWGPX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. NWGPX (-11.28). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. NWGPX (29.01).
| FTHFX | NWGPX | FTHFX / NWGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | -3.954 | -164% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 184M | 5,978% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.82 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -11.28 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 1.47 | 2,536% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 29.01 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | -9.95 | -1,552% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers