Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMRX
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value I
Price$34.16
Change-$0.26 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.26M
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMRX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NSMRX (93.3M). NSMRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMRX (1.31) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMRX (19 years). NSMRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. NSMRX (-1.14). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. NSMRX (58.37).
| FTHFX | NSMRX | FTHFX / NSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 3.296 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 93.3M | 11,790% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.31 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -1.14 | -404% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 20.32 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 58.37 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 27.62 | 559% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers