Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMRX
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value I
Price$31.91
Change-$0.52 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.05M
FTHFX vs NSMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMRX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NSMRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. NSMRX (88.1M). NSMRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMRX (1.37) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMRX (19 years). NSMRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. NSMRX (-2.41). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NSMRX (61.40).
| FTHFX | NSMRX | FTHFX / NSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.06 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -3.508 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 88.1M | 11,249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -2.41 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 27.45 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 61.40 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | 11.99 | 1,104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers