Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value C
Price$27.83
Change+$0.61 (+2.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.29M
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSMCX (111M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMCX: FTHFX (0.63) vs NSMCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMCX (19 years). NSMCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. NSMCX (6.87). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. NSMCX (19.22).
| FTHFX | NSMCX | FTHFX / NSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.06 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 6.997 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 111M | 10,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 6.87 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 22.90 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 19.22 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 23.25 | 1,202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement