Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMCX
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value C
Price$26.42
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.2M
FTHFX vs NSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSMCX (104M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs NSMCX (0.34). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMCX (19 years). NSMCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. NSMCX (2.84). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. NSMCX (22.67).
| FTHFX | NSMCX | FTHFX / NSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.06 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | 4.303 | 318% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 104M | 10,673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.34 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 2.84 | 410% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 21.43 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | 22.67 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | 2.39 | 9,424% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers