Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
Price$34.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.57M
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSMAX (97.6M). NSMAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSMAX (1.01) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMAX (19 years). NSMAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. NSMAX (-4.02). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. NSMAX (60.43).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.42 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 7.360 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 97.6M | 11,373% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.01 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -4.02 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 36.26 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 60.43 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 29.57 | 573% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement