Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSMAX
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
Price$35.66
Change+$0.36 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.02M
FTHFX vs NSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSMAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSMAX (110M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSMAX: FTHFX (0.65) vs NSMAX (0.45). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSMAX (19 years). NSMAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. NSMAX (11.36). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.24 vs. NSMAX (31.61).
| FTHFX | NSMAX | FTHFX / NSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | 5.562 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 110M | 10,091% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.45 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 11.36 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 33.56 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.24 | 31.61 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.55 | 49.51 | 557% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement