Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCRX
FTHFX vs NSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps I
Price$50.78
Change+$0.19 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.8M
FTHFX vs NSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCRX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NSCRX (240M). NSCRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCRX (1.01) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCRX (21 years). NSCRX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. NSCRX (-14.77). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. NSCRX (46.79).
| FTHFX | NSCRX | FTHFX / NSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | -1.014 | -489% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 240M | 4,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.01 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -14.77 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 15.66 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 46.79 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | 23.42 | 652% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers