Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCRX
FTHFX vs NSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps I
Price$48.40
Change-$0.95 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.54M
FTHFX vs NSCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCRX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. NSCRX (233M). NSCRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCRX (1.04) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCRX (21 years). NSCRX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. NSCRX (-11.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NSCRX (41.46).
| FTHFX | NSCRX | FTHFX / NSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -5.653 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 233M | 4,335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.04 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -11.34 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 14.09 | 280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 41.46 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | 9.61 | 1,376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement