Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCRX
FTHFX vs NSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps I
Price$54.15
Change+$0.59 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.25M
FTHFX vs NSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCRX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSCRX (278M). FTHFX (0.63) and NSCRX (0.62) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCRX (21 years). NSCRX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCRX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. NSCRX (5.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. NSCRX (12.51).
| FTHFX | NSCRX | FTHFX / NSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 7.143 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 278M | 3,993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.62 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 5.72 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 12.04 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 12.51 | 577% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 49.49 | 565% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement