Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
Price$54.09
Change-$0.06 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.36M
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSCFX (257M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (1.08) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCFX (13 years). NSCFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. NSCFX (-15.61). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. NSCFX (45.09).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 3.482 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 257M | 4,319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.08 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -15.61 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 19.68 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 45.09 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 32.72 | 518% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers