Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
Price$54.75
Change+$0.47 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.92M
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSCFX (276M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (0.79) vs FTHFX (0.65). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCFX (13 years). NSCFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. NSCFX (7.48). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.24 vs. NSCFX (14.65).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | 6.043 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 276M | 4,022% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.79 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 7.48 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 15.72 | 300% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.24 | 14.65 | 479% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.55 | 52.63 | 524% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers