Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCFX
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCFX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
Price$53.07
Change+$0.12 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.25M
FTHFX vs NSCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSCFX (267M). NSCFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCFX (1.06) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCFX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCFX (13 years). NSCFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NSCFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. NSCFX (0.74). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. NSCFX (19.97).
| FTHFX | NSCFX | FTHFX / NSCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 1.531 | 922% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 267M | 4,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 0.74 | 1,705% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 13.77 | 369% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | 19.97 | 382% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 28.31 | 802% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement