Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$39.75
Change+$0.37 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.91M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NSCCX (260M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.48 vs. NSCCX (-18.59). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. NSCCX (37.11).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | 3.894 | 265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 260M | 4,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.08 | 928% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | -18.59 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 16.38 | 390% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 37.11 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | 11.96 | 1,586% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement