Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$37.15
Change-$0.06 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.37M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSCCX (266M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs NSCCX (0.07). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. NSCCX (-4.43). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. NSCCX (-1.43).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | -2.901 | -472% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 266M | 4,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.07 | 926% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | -4.43 | -263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | -1.67 | -3,011% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | -1.43 | -5,292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | -5.24 | -4,297% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers