Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$35.93
Change-$0.71 (-1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.16M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. NSCCX (228M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. NSCCX (-17.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NSCCX (21.67).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -6.090 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 228M | 4,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.08 | 962% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -17.60 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 2.38 | 1,657% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 21.67 | 432% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | -13.65 | -970% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement