Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$38.23
Change+$0.39 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.4M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NSCCX (243M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs NSCCX (0.08). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. NSCCX (-13.40). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. NSCCX (32.00).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -0.078 | -4,184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 243M | 4,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.08 | 959% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -13.40 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 8.38 | 594% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 32.00 | 321% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -5.72 | -2,651% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers