Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCCX
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.70
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C
Price$40.29
Change-$0.22 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.33M
FTHFX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NSCCX (269M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs NSCCX (0.07). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCCX (21 years). NSCCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.44 vs. NSCCX (-25.07). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.10 vs. NSCCX (11.78).
| FTHFX | NSCCX | FTHFX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.471 | 5.881 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 269M | 4,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.07 | 926% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.44 | -25.07 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.81 | -0.68 | -5,840% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.10 | 11.78 | 689% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.11 | 1.52 | 11,234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers