Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCAX
FTHFX vs NSCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps A
Price$48.64
Change+$0.51 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.4M
FTHFX vs NSCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NSCAX (243M). NSCAX (0.78) and FTHFX (0.76) have matching dividends . FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCAX (21 years). NSCAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. NSCAX (-8.08). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. NSCAX (48.87).
| FTHFX | NSCAX | FTHFX / NSCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 0.309 | 1,060% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 243M | 4,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.78 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -8.08 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 18.22 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 48.87 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 13.75 | 1,103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers