Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NSCAX
FTHFX vs NSCAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NSCAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps A
Price$48.45
Change-$0.45 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.8M
FTHFX vs NSCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NSCAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NSCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NSCAX (245M). NSCAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NSCAX (0.78) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NSCAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NSCAX (21 years). NSCAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). NSCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). NSCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NSCAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. NSCAX (-14.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. NSCAX (34.28).
| FTHFX | NSCAX | FTHFX / NSCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | -0.082 | -7,873% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 245M | 4,490% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -14.92 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 4.12 | 903% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 34.28 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 19.37 | 797% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement