Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$22.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NMSCX (2.5B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.35) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSCX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NMSCX (23.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. NMSCX (-4.77). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. NMSCX (-7.99).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | -3.529 | -400% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.5B | 443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.35 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -4.77 | -262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 1.82 | 2,792% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | -7.99 | -954% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 16.87 | 1,346% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement