Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.70
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$23.56
Change+$0.34 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NMSCX (2.56B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.35) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSCX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSCX (23.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.44 vs. NMSCX (-15.30). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.10 vs. NMSCX (0.25).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.471 | 1.133 | 1,013% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.56B | 433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.35 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.44 | -15.30 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.81 | -5.86 | -680% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.10 | 0.25 | 32,040% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.11 | 19.66 | 870% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement