Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSCX
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$22.72
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
FTHFX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and NMSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NMSCX (2.58B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSCX (1.37) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSCX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSCX (23.00). NMSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSCX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. NMSCX (-11.31). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. NMSCX (12.66).
| FTHFX | NMSCX | FTHFX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.20 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | -1.002 | -890% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.58B | 431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -11.31 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 1.38 | 3,653% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 12.66 | 749% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 10.96 | 1,547% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers