Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.71
Change-$0.14 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61B
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NMSAX (2.61B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.27) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSAX (23.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. NMSAX (-9.55). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. NMSAX (8.56).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | -4.235 | -153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 2.61B | 421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.27 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -9.55 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | -14.80 | -252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 8.56 | 1,041% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 2.24 | 6,882% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement