Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.54
Change+$0.13 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NMSAX (2.56B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.04) vs FTHFX (0.65). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. NMSAX (23.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. NMSAX (0.54). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.24 vs. NMSAX (-12.54).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | 5.822 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.56B | 434% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.04 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 0.54 | 2,649% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | -1.42 | -3,312% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.24 | -12.54 | -560% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.55 | 33.57 | 821% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers