Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$20.10
Change-$1.26 (-5.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.4B
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. NMSAX (2.4B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.29) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSAX (23.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. NMSAX (-14.74). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NMSAX (12.13).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -11.337 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 2.4B | 413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.29 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -14.74 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | -12.36 | -319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 12.13 | 771% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | -10.17 | -1,301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers