Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NMSAX
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.55
Change+$0.24 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
FTHFX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NMSAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NMSAX (2.64B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: NMSAX (1.20) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than NMSAX (0.45). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NMSAX (23.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NMSAX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.48 vs. NMSAX (-8.94). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. NMSAX (23.82).
| FTHFX | NMSAX | FTHFX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.45 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | -0.529 | -1,951% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 2.64B | 428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.20 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | -8.94 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 7.70 | 830% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 23.82 | 479% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | 17.06 | 1,112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers