Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NINLX
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINLX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value I
Price$20.06
Change-$0.39 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
FTHFX vs NINLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINLX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NINLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. NINLX (1.04B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINLX: FTHFX (0.79) vs NINLX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINLX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NINLX (15 years). NINLX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NINLX (21.00). FTHFX (1000000) and NINLX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. NINLX (-2.10). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NINLX (48.59).
| FTHFX | NINLX | FTHFX / NINLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -7.000 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 1.04B | 951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -2.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 12.38 | 319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 48.59 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | 25.69 | 515% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers