Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NINCX
FTHFX vs NINCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value C
Price$18.47
Change-$0.36 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
FTHFX vs NINCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and NINCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. NINCX (1.04B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs NINCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NINCX (15 years). NINCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NINCX (21.00). NINCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NINCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. NINCX (-3.30). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NINCX (39.71).
| FTHFX | NINCX | FTHFX / NINCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -7.465 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 1.04B | 951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -3.30 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 8.33 | 474% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 39.71 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | 10.61 | 1,247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers