Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NINCX
FTHFX vs NINCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value C
Price$19.91
Change+$0.09 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
FTHFX vs NINCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NINCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. NINCX (1.12B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs NINCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NINCX (15 years). NINCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NINCX (21.00). NINCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NINCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. NINCX (1.17). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. NINCX (39.43).
| FTHFX | NINCX | FTHFX / NINCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | -0.250 | -1,978% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 1.12B | 966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | 1.17 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 13.00 | 350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 39.43 | 253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | 30.42 | 502% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement