Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs NINAX
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs NINAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
Price$21.01
Change+$0.27 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
FTHFX vs NINAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. NINAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and NINAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. NINAX (1.12B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than NINAX: FTHFX (0.76) vs NINAX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than NINAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs NINAX (15 years). NINAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NINAX (21.00). NINAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: NINAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. NINAX (4.37). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. NINAX (52.25).
| FTHFX | NINAX | FTHFX / NINAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -0.048 | -6,895% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 1.12B | 955% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 4.37 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 20.26 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 52.25 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 35.91 | 422% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement