Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSVVX
FTHFX vs MSVVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSVVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
MetLife Small Company Equity Investor
Price$5.22
Change-$8.00 (-60.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6M
FTHFX vs MSVVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSVVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and MSVVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. MSVVX (7.6M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than MSVVX: FTHFX (0.63) vs MSVVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSVVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MSVVX (7 years). MSVVX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MSVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). MSVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSVVX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. MSVVX (-59.38). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. MSVVX (-58.15).
| FTHFX | MSVVX | FTHFX / MSVVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.15 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 3.984 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 7.6M | 146,072% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | -59.38 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | -57.51 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | -58.15 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement