Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSVVX
FTHFX vs MSVVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSVVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
MetLife Small Company Equity Investor
Price$12.75
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.72M
FTHFX vs MSVVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSVVX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and MSVVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. MSVVX (7.72M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than MSVVX: FTHFX (0.76) vs MSVVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSVVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MSVVX (7 years). MSVVX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MSVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). MSVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSVVX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. MSVVX (1.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. MSVVX (47.55).
| FTHFX | MSVVX | FTHFX / MSVVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.15 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 2.163 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 7.72M | 138,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 1.92 | 312% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 22.68 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 47.55 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement