Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSCGX
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.54
Change-$0.53 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Y3
Price$11.30
Change-$0.12 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCGX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and MSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. MSCGX (1.76B). MSCGX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: MSCGX (0.85) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MSCGX (20 years). MSCGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCGX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. MSCGX (-11.74). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. MSCGX (-4.06).
| FTHFX | MSCGX | FTHFX / MSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.641 | 1.873 | 782% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.76B | 631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.85 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | -11.74 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | 7.54 | 635% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.55 | -4.06 | -2,009% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.61 | 10.07 | 1,953% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers