Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MSCGX
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MSCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Y3
Price$11.58
Change-$0.20 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FTHFX vs MSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MSCGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and MSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. MSCGX (1.63B). MSCGX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: MSCGX (0.87) vs FTHFX (0.70). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MSCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MSCGX (20 years). MSCGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: MSCGX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.33 vs. MSCGX (-8.67). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.83 vs. MSCGX (5.17).
| FTHFX | MSCGX | FTHFX / MSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.50 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.99 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 5.085 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.63B | 683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.87 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -8.67 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 9.23 | 453% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.83 | 5.17 | 1,680% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.84 | 12.11 | 1,427% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement