Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs MNSQX
FTHFX vs MNSQX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs MNSQX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Invesco Main Street Small Cap R5
Price$23.70
Change+$0.34 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
FTHFX vs MNSQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. MNSQX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and MNSQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. MNSQX (2.49B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than MNSQX: FTHFX (0.63) vs MNSQX (0.43). FTHFX was incepted earlier than MNSQX: FTHFX (14 years) vs MNSQX (7 years). MNSQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). MNSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX (1000000) and MNSQX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. MNSQX (4.21). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. MNSQX (18.14).
| FTHFX | MNSQX | FTHFX / MNSQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.76 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.76 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 6.135 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.49B | 446% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.43 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 4.21 | 385% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 21.31 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 18.14 | 398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers