Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LZSCX
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.02
Change-$0.94 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Instl
Price$11.11
Change-$0.34 (-2.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.91M
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and LZSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LZSCX (32.9M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs LZSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZSCX (34 years). LZSCX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZSCX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.29 vs. LZSCX (-18.67). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.31 vs. LZSCX (-16.54).
| FTHFX | LZSCX | FTHFX / LZSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.926 | -7.107 | -112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 32.9M | 33,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | -18.67 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.76 | -11.76 | -338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.31 | -16.54 | -504% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.67 | -17.91 | -925% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement