Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LZSCX
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.07
Change+$0.57 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Instl
Price$12.21
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.79M
FTHFX vs LZSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZSCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LZSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LZSCX (34.8M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZSCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs LZSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZSCX (34 years). LZSCX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZSCX (10000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. LZSCX (-13.28). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. LZSCX (-12.98).
| FTHFX | LZSCX | FTHFX / LZSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.641 | 2.090 | 700% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 34.8M | 31,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | -13.28 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | -2.48 | -1,935% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.55 | -12.98 | -628% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.61 | -7.55 | -2,606% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement