Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LZCOX
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LZCOX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.85
Change+$0.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.37M
FTHFX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LZCOX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LZCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. LZCOX (33.4M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FTHFX (0.70) vs LZCOX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LZCOX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.48 vs. LZCOX (-16.31). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. LZCOX (-6.18).
| FTHFX | LZCOX | FTHFX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.57 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | -5.197 | -199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 33.4M | 33,832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | -16.31 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | -1.79 | -3,560% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | -6.18 | -1,844% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | -19.16 | -989% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers