Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
ClearBridge Small Cap A
Price$40.68
Change-$0.10 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets720.75M
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMSAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. LMSAX (721M). LMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: LMSAX (0.93) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMSAX (17 years). LMSAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMSAX (33.00). LMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. LMSAX (-3.84). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. LMSAX (19.31).
| FTHFX | LMSAX | FTHFX / LMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 3.511 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 721M | 1,526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -3.84 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 21.59 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 19.31 | 491% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 23.00 | 737% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement