Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.32
Change+$0.70 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
ClearBridge Small Cap A
Price$40.11
Change+$0.23 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets733.51M
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMSAX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LMSAX (734M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMSAX: FTHFX (0.65) vs LMSAX (0.43). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMSAX (17 years). LMSAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. LMSAX (-0.31). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.50 vs. LMSAX (-8.21).
| FTHFX | LMSAX | FTHFX / LMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.355 | 6.139 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 734M | 1,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.43 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | -0.31 | -4,565% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.07 | 12.46 | 394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.50 | -8.21 | -883% |
| Returns for 10 years | 280.55 | 46.63 | 602% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers