Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMSAX
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
ClearBridge Small Cap A
Price$40.16
Change-$0.33 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.04M
FTHFX vs LMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMSAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. LMSAX (725M). LMSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: LMSAX (0.99) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMSAX (17 years). LMSAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMSAX (33.00). LMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. LMSAX (2.00). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. LMSAX (17.96).
| FTHFX | LMSAX | FTHFX / LMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 2.188 | 297% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 725M | 1,517% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.99 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 2.00 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 3.39 | 1,099% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 17.96 | 496% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 17.78 | 868% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement