Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMBCX
FTHFX vs LMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMBCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity C
Price$13.29
Change+$0.21 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.29M
FTHFX vs LMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMBCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LMBCX (124M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMBCX: FTHFX (0.63) vs LMBCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMBCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMBCX (17 years). LMBCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMBCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. LMBCX (15.16). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. LMBCX (-1.52).
| FTHFX | LMBCX | FTHFX / LMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.13 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 5.560 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 124M | 8,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 15.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 25.28 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | -1.52 | -4,763% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 36.55 | 765% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement