Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMBCX
FTHFX vs LMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMBCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity C
Price$12.92
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.26M
FTHFX vs LMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMBCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. LMBCX (116M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMBCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs LMBCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMBCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMBCX (17 years). LMBCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). LMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMBCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). LMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.42 vs. FTHFX (8.53). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. LMBCX (32.85).
| FTHFX | LMBCX | FTHFX / LMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.13 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 13.820 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 116M | 9,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 13.42 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 32.31 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 32.85 | 316% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 4.86 | 3,673% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers