Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMBAX
FTHFX vs LMBAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMBAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity A
Price$15.85
Change+$0.44 (+2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.29M
FTHFX vs LMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMBAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LMBAX (124M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMBAX: FTHFX (0.63) vs LMBAX (0.01). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMBAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMBAX (17 years). LMBAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LMBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMBAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). LMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.25 vs. FTHFX (16.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. LMBAX (7.87).
| FTHFX | LMBAX | FTHFX / LMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.41 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 5.596 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 124M | 8,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.01 | 5,518% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 17.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 30.76 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 7.87 | 918% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 57.03 | 490% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement