Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMASX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$35.09
Change+$0.18 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets719.26M
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMASX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. LMASX (719M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FTHFX (0.76) vs LMASX (0.40). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMASX (40 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMASX (33.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. LMASX (-3.58). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. LMASX (16.29).
| FTHFX | LMASX | FTHFX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 0.229 | 2,168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 719M | 1,502% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.40 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -3.58 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 8.32 | 547% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 16.29 | 612% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | 3.97 | 3,851% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers