Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMASX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$34.14
Change+$0.13 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets723.37M
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMASX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LMASX (723M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FTHFX (0.69) vs LMASX (0.36). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMASX (40 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LMASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. LMASX (-3.42). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. LMASX (-13.24).
| FTHFX | LMASX | FTHFX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | -2.485 | -568% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 723M | 1,535% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.36 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -3.42 | -366% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 11.89 | 428% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | -13.24 | -575% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 11.52 | 1,971% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers