Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMASX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$35.61
Change-$0.29 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.04M
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMASX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. LMASX (725M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FTHFX (0.74) vs LMASX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMASX (40 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMASX (33.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. LMASX (0.61). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. LMASX (10.91).
| FTHFX | LMASX | FTHFX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 1.714 | 379% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 725M | 1,517% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.38 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 0.61 | 758% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 0.18 | 20,370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 10.91 | 817% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 4.98 | 3,101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement