Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMASX
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMASX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$36.02
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets720.75M
FTHFX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMASX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and LMASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. LMASX (721M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FTHFX (0.69) vs LMASX (0.36). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMASX (40 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMASX (33.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMASX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. LMASX (-5.18). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. LMASX (12.19).
| FTHFX | LMASX | FTHFX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.85 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.86 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 2.885 | 309% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 721M | 1,526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.36 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -5.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 17.82 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 12.19 | 778% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 9.63 | 1,759% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement