Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LMARX
FTHFX vs LMARX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LMARX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
FTHFX vs LMARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LMARX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LMARX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. LMARX (748M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LMARX: FTHFX (0.70) vs LMARX (0.13). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LMARX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LMARX (19 years). LMARX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LMARX (33.00). LMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LMARX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. LMARX (7.25). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. LMARX (35.10).
| FTHFX | LMARX | FTHFX / LMARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.43 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.43 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 6.109 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 748M | 1,511% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.13 | 559% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 7.25 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 22.49 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 35.10 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 44.01 | 406% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement