Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs LGSCX
FTHFX vs LGSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs LGSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity FI
Price$14.68
Change+$0.35 (+2.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.29M
FTHFX vs LGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. LGSCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and LGSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LGSCX (124M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than LGSCX: FTHFX (0.63) vs LGSCX (0.01). FTHFX was incepted earlier than LGSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs LGSCX (23 years). LGSCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). LGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). LGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: LGSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). LGSCX (16.71) and FTHFX (16.23) have marching annual gain over last year. FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. LGSCX (5.13).
| FTHFX | LGSCX | FTHFX / LGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.62 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 5.688 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 124M | 8,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.01 | 4,345% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 16.71 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 29.52 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 5.13 | 1,407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 49.97 | 560% |