Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs KCSSX
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs KCSSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.07
Change+$0.57 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Knights of Columbus Small Cap S
Price$15.00
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.6M
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. KCSSX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and KCSSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. KCSSX (175M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than KCSSX: FTHFX (0.69) vs KCSSX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than KCSSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs KCSSX (10 years). KCSSX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). KCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). KCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: KCSSX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. KCSSX (-0.28). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. KCSSX (26.12).
| FTHFX | KCSSX | FTHFX / KCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.641 | 14.589 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 175M | 6,343% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.38 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | -0.28 | -2,577% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | 36.06 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.55 | 26.12 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.61 | 63.74 | 308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers