Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs KCSSX
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs KCSSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Knights of Columbus Small Cap S
Price$13.07
Change+$0.13 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.33M
FTHFX vs KCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. KCSSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and KCSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. KCSSX (152M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than KCSSX: FTHFX (0.76) vs KCSSX (0.44). FTHFX was incepted earlier than KCSSX: FTHFX (14 years) vs KCSSX (10 years). KCSSX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). KCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). KCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: KCSSX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. KCSSX (1.47). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. KCSSX (43.50).
| FTHFX | KCSSX | FTHFX / KCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | -0.226 | -1,452% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 152M | 7,039% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 1.47 | 406% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 25.60 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 43.50 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers