Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HSZCX
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HSZCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HSZCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and HSZCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. HSZCX (5.81M). HSZCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: HSZCX (2.56) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HSZCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HSZCX (26 years). HSZCX (6.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HSZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HSZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HSZCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). HSZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. FTHFX (2.03). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. HSZCX (-4.22).
| FTHFX | HSZCX | FTHFX / HSZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 6.98 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 4.348 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 5.81M | 185,918% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 2.56 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | 4.65 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | -18.10 | -251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | -4.22 | -2,361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | -71.19 | -215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement