Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HSZCX
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HSZCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HSZCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and HSZCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. HSZCX (5.9M). HSZCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: HSZCX (2.56) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HSZCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HSZCX (26 years). HSZCX (6.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HSZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HSZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HSZCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). HSZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. FTHFX (5.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. HSZCX (-3.32).
| FTHFX | HSZCX | FTHFX / HSZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 6.98 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 5.017 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 5.9M | 181,233% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 2.56 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 6.71 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | -18.41 | -270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | -3.32 | -3,095% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | -71.78 | -211% |