Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HSZCX
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HSZCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
FTHFX vs HSZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HSZCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and HSZCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. HSZCX (5.64M). HSZCX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: HSZCX (2.71) vs FTHFX (0.79). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HSZCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HSZCX (26 years). HSZCX (6.98) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HSZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). HSZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HSZCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). HSZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. FTHFX (-1.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. HSZCX (-13.29).
| FTHFX | HSZCX | FTHFX / HSZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 6.98 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | 0.334 | -1,113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 5.64M | 175,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 2.71 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -0.03 | 5,658% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | -22.25 | -177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | -13.29 | -704% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | -73.45 | -180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement