Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs HFCGX
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs HFCGX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.64
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$33.69
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets480.65M
FTHFX vs HFCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. HFCGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and HFCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. HFCGX (481M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: FTHFX (0.69) vs HFCGX (0.10). FTHFX was incepted earlier than HFCGX: FTHFX (14 years) vs HFCGX (29 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: HFCGX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. HFCGX (3.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.57 vs. HFCGX (35.43).
| FTHFX | HFCGX | FTHFX / HFCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.694 | 5.844 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 481M | 2,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.10 | 657% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 3.92 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 43.58 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.57 | 35.43 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.13 | 73.80 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers