Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSQRX
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSQRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
Price$33.31
Change-$0.34 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets922.15M
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSQRX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GSQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. GSQRX (922M). GSQRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GSQRX (0.97) vs FTHFX (0.74). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSQRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSQRX (18 years). GSQRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GSQRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSQRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. GSQRX (-12.88). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. GSQRX (-15.37).
| FTHFX | GSQRX | FTHFX / GSQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 3.608 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 922M | 1,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.97 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -12.88 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | -27.66 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | -15.37 | -580% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | -33.73 | -458% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement