Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSQRX
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSQRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.32
Change+$0.70 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
Price$31.01
Change+$0.45 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.8M
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSQRX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GSQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GSQRX (936M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GSQRX: FTHFX (0.65) vs GSQRX (0.23). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSQRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSQRX (18 years). GSQRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GSQRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSQRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. GSQRX (-5.71). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.50 vs. GSQRX (-39.73).
| FTHFX | GSQRX | FTHFX / GSQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.355 | 7.861 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 936M | 1,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.23 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | -5.71 | -247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.07 | -15.39 | -319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.50 | -39.73 | -182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 280.55 | -23.28 | -1,205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement