Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSQRX
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSQRX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.70
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
Price$35.70
Change+$0.57 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets900.89M
FTHFX vs GSQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSQRX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GSQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GSQRX (901M). GSQRX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GSQRX (0.90) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSQRX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSQRX (18 years). GSQRX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GSQRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSQRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.97 vs. GSQRX (-16.84). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.79 vs. GSQRX (-24.40).
| FTHFX | GSQRX | FTHFX / GSQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.625 | 11.042 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 901M | 1,232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.90 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.97 | -16.84 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.00 | -19.68 | -203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.79 | -24.40 | -319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.48 | -27.48 | -624% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement