Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSCZX
FTHFX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSCZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$18.36
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets914.61M
FTHFX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSCZX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GSCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. GSCZX (915M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FTHFX (0.70) vs GSCZX (0.20). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSCZX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. GSCZX (4.24). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. GSCZX (24.41).
| FTHFX | GSCZX | FTHFX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.502 | 3.794 | 277% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 915M | 1,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.20 | 355% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 4.24 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.33 | 16.73 | 337% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.71 | 24.41 | 425% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.64 | 11.65 | 1,533% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement