Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSCZX
FTHFX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSCZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$17.20
Change+$0.07 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets857.87M
FTHFX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSCZX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GSCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GSCZX (858M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FTHFX (0.69) vs GSCZX (0.19). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSCZX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. GSCZX (-3.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. GSCZX (-7.87).
| FTHFX | GSCZX | FTHFX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | -3.001 | -470% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 858M | 1,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.19 | 357% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -3.98 | -315% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 14.15 | 359% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | -7.87 | -969% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 12.20 | 1,861% |