Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GSCZX
FTHFX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GSCZX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.55
Change+$0.40 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$17.77
Change-$0.06 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets891.67M
FTHFX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GSCZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GSCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GSCZX (892M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FTHFX (0.63) vs GSCZX (0.26). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GSCZX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. GSCZX (-1.32). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. GSCZX (-11.24).
| FTHFX | GSCZX | FTHFX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.23 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 5.952 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 892M | 1,244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.26 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | -1.32 | -1,231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 5.67 | 723% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | -11.24 | -642% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | 37.67 | 742% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement