Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$16.49
Change+$1.77 (+12.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GQSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GQSCX (2.64M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.63) vs GQSCX (0.23). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (8 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). GQSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. FTHFX (16.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. GQSCX (30.52).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | 7.008 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.64M | 420,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.23 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 17.85 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 25.00 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.22 | 30.52 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement