Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.62
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$16.19
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GQSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GQSCX (2.59M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.65) vs GQSCX (0.24). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (8 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). GQSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. FTHFX (14.21). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.24 vs. GQSCX (30.54).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.972 | 5.062 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.59M | 429,068% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.24 | 270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 15.05 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 30.52 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.24 | 30.54 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement