Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GQSCX
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GQSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.54
Change-$0.53 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$16.19
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52M
FTHFX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GQSCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GQSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GQSCX (2.52M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs GQSCX (0.28). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GQSCX (8 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). GQSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GQSCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. GQSCX (-1.96). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. GQSCX (45.85).
| FTHFX | GQSCX | FTHFX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.65 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.641 | 15.373 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.52M | 440,651% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.28 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | -1.96 | -367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | 25.09 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.55 | 45.85 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers