Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$20.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.46M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GMSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GMSMX (98.5M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.69) vs GMSMX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (25 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. GMSMX (-5.09). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. GMSMX (9.03).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 4.326 | 326% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 98.5M | 11,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.38 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -5.09 | -246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 22.75 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | 9.03 | 844% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 32.67 | 695% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement