Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$20.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.66M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GMSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GMSMX (99.7M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.76) vs GMSMX (0.41). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (24 years). GMSMX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. GMSMX (-1.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. GMSMX (44.63).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 3.349 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 99.7M | 10,832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.41 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -1.78 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 20.34 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 44.63 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | 20.39 | 749% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement