Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$21.13
Change+$0.20 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.04M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GMSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GMSMX (97M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.70) vs GMSMX (0.39). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (24 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.48 vs. GMSMX (1.32). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. GMSMX (48.47).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | 8.182 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 97M | 11,443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.39 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 1.32 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 38.98 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 48.47 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | 41.84 | 453% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers