Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$20.30
Change-$0.11 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.56M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GMSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. GMSMX (94.6M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.74) vs GMSMX (0.41). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (24 years). GMSMX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. GMSMX (0.90). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.14 vs. GMSMX (35.59).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.16 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.495 | 3.922 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 94.6M | 11,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.41 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 0.90 | 509% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 9.86 | 378% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.14 | 35.59 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.43 | 19.24 | 802% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement