Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GMSMX
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GMSMX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.70
Change+$0.51 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$21.19
Change+$0.24 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.94M
FTHFX vs GMSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GMSMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GMSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GMSMX (96.9M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: FTHFX (0.69) vs GMSMX (0.38). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GMSMX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GMSMX (24 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GMSMX (17.87). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GMSMX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.44 vs. GMSMX (-8.40). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.10 vs. GMSMX (20.07).
| FTHFX | GMSMX | FTHFX / GMSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.471 | 7.475 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 96.9M | 11,455% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.38 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.44 | -8.40 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.81 | 18.92 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.10 | 20.07 | 404% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.11 | 34.18 | 501% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement