Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSUX
FTHFX vs GCSUX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSUX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R6
Price$29.89
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets549.94M
FTHFX vs GCSUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSUX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCSUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GCSUX (550M). GCSUX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSUX (0.94) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSUX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSUX (10 years). GCSUX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FTHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCSUX: FTHFX (1000000) vs GCSUX (5000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. GCSUX (6.45). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. GCSUX (2.05).
| FTHFX | GCSUX | FTHFX / GCSUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.83 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 7.595 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 550M | 2,018% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.94 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 6.45 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 37.80 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.22 | 2.05 | 3,710% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.11 | 60.42 | 376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement