Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.91
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
Price$19.74
Change+$0.21 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets452.43M
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSCX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. GCSCX (452M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs GCSCX (0.50). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSCX (28 years). GCSCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. GCSCX (-2.66). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 102.86 vs. GCSCX (6.31).
| FTHFX | GCSCX | FTHFX / GCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.04 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 1.595 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 452M | 2,367% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.50 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | -2.66 | -225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 24.36 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.86 | 6.31 | 1,629% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.69 | 14.73 | 1,030% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers