Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
Price$19.67
Change+$0.11 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.73M
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GCSCX (456M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSCX: FTHFX (0.76) vs GCSCX (0.50). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSCX (28 years). GCSCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. GCSCX (-11.51). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. GCSCX (3.23).
| FTHFX | GCSCX | FTHFX / GCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.04 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 1.235 | 401% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 456M | 2,368% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.50 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -11.51 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 18.50 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 3.23 | 3,091% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | 16.62 | 919% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers