Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSCX
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
Price$21.66
Change+$0.20 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.66M
FTHFX vs GCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. GCSCX (523M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than GCSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs GCSCX (0.47). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSCX (28 years). GCSCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.48 vs. GCSCX (-2.86). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. GCSCX (15.66).
| FTHFX | GCSCX | FTHFX / GCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.04 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.326 | 11.477 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 523M | 2,122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.47 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | -2.86 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 44.52 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.02 | 15.66 | 728% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.61 | 41.51 | 457% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers