Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$26.40
Change+$0.15 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.73M
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and GCSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GCSAX (456M). GCSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSAX (0.84) vs FTHFX (0.76). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSAX (28 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. GCSAX (-7.62). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. GCSAX (18.62).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.954 | 1.656 | 299% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 456M | 2,368% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -7.62 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 25.55 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.73 | 18.62 | 536% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.73 | 40.35 | 379% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers