Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs GCSAX
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs GCSAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.47
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$29.25
Change-$0.19 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.4M
FTHFX vs GCSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. GCSAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and GCSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. GCSAX (520M). GCSAX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: GCSAX (0.75) vs FTHFX (0.69). FTHFX was incepted earlier than GCSAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs GCSAX (28 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: GCSAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). GCSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.34 vs. FTHFX (-1.91). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. GCSAX (20.18).
| FTHFX | GCSAX | FTHFX / GCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 12.630 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 520M | 2,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.75 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -1.34 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 44.50 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 20.18 | 470% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 58.63 | 289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers