Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHF vs VWO
FTHF vs VWO Comparison
Open Charts FTHF vs VWO
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$26.41
Change-$0.06 (-0.23%)
Volume$3.77K
Net Assets46.4M
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
Price$49.39
Change-$0.05 (-0.10%)
Volume$8.25M
Net Assets116.44B
FTHF vs VWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHF vs. VWO commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHF is a StrongBuy and VWO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWO has more net assets: 116B vs. FTHF (46.4M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than VWO: FTHF (26.241) vs VWO (12.434). FTHF was incepted earlier than VWO: FTHF (2 years) vs VWO (20 years). VWO (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover VWO (8.00) vs VWO (8.00).
| FTHF | VWO | FTHF / VWO | |
| Gain YTD | 26.241 | 12.434 | 211% |
| Net Assets | 46.4M | 116B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.07 | 1,071% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 8.00 | 375% |
| Yield | 2.77 | 3.02 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTHF | VWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHF has been loosely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTHF jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||
VWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VWO has been loosely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VWO jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VWO | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| WB - VWO | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| BSAC - VWO | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| ATHM - VWO | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| BZ - VWO | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| SQM - VWO | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||