Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHF vs VWO
FTHF vs VWO Comparison
Open Charts FTHF vs VWO
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$37.52
Change-$1.14 (-2.95%)
Volume$372
Net Assets76.94M
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
Price$56.75
Change+$2.24 (+4.11%)
Volume$19M
Net Assets142.58B
FTHF vs VWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHF vs. VWO commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHF is a Hold and VWO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWO has more net assets: 143B vs. FTHF (76.9M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than VWO: FTHF (16.917) vs VWO (5.562). FTHF was incepted earlier than VWO: FTHF (2 years) vs VWO (21 years). VWO (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover VWO (6.00) vs VWO (6.00).
| FTHF | VWO | FTHF / VWO | |
| Gain YTD | 16.917 | 5.562 | 304% |
| Net Assets | 76.9M | 143B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.07 | 1,071% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 6.00 | 633% |
| Yield | 3.82 | 2.66 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTHF | VWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.33% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||
VWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VWO has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VWO jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VWO | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| JD - VWO | 71% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| BILI - VWO | 71% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BIDU - VWO | 68% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| BABA - VWO | 67% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| BZ - VWO | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
More | ||||