Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHF vs SPEM
FTHF vs SPEM Comparison
Open Charts FTHF vs SPEM
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$37.52
Change-$1.14 (-2.95%)
Volume$372
Net Assets76.94M
State Street® SPDR® Portfolio EM ETF
Price$49.06
Change-$0.46 (-0.93%)
Volume$5.62K
Net Assets16.59B
FTHF vs SPEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHF vs. SPEM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHF is a Hold and SPEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPEM has more net assets: 16.6B vs. FTHF (76.9M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than SPEM: FTHF (16.917) vs SPEM (5.789). FTHF was incepted earlier than SPEM: FTHF (2 years) vs SPEM (19 years). SPEM (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover SPEM (1.00) vs SPEM (1.00).
| FTHF | SPEM | FTHF / SPEM | |
| Gain YTD | 16.917 | 5.789 | 292% |
| Net Assets | 76.9M | 16.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.07 | 1,071% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 1.00 | 3,800% |
| Yield | 3.82 | 2.62 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTHF | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.33% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||
SPEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPEM has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPEM jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPEM | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| JD - SPEM | 71% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| BILI - SPEM | 70% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| VALE - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | +5.33% | ||
| BZ - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| DD - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
More | ||||