Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHF vs SPEM
FTHF vs SPEM Comparison
Open Charts FTHF vs SPEM
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$29.69
Change+$0.22 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.01M
SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
Price$46.26
Change-$0.14 (-0.30%)
Volume$1.68M
Net Assets14.13B
FTHF vs SPEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHF vs. SPEM commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHF is a Buy and SPEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPEM has more net assets: 14.1B vs. FTHF (52M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than SPEM: FTHF (40.872) vs SPEM (22.113). FTHF was incepted earlier than SPEM: FTHF (2 years) vs SPEM (19 years). SPEM (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover SPEM (2.00) vs SPEM (2.00).
| FTHF | SPEM | FTHF / SPEM | |
| Gain YTD | 40.872 | 22.113 | 185% |
| Net Assets | 52M | 14.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.07 | 1,071% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 2.00 | 1,500% |
| Yield | 2.70 | 2.59 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTHF | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
SPEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPEM has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPEM | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| BZ - SPEM | 69% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| VALE - SPEM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| ATHM - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| DD - SPEM | 66% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| PDD - SPEM | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||