Intraday BUY SELL Signals
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHF vs SM
FTHF vs SM Comparison
Open Charts FTHF vs SM
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$31.98
Change-$0.29 (-0.90%)
Volume$210
Net Assets57.22M
FTHF vs SM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHF vs. SM commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHF is a Buy and SM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SM: Fundamental Ratings
SM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTHF | SM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 16% Poorly correlated | -12.50% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||
SM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with NOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then NOG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y