Intraday BUY SELL Signals
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHF vs SM
FTHF vs SM Comparison
Open Charts FTHF vs SM
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$32.71
Change+$0.20 (+0.62%)
Volume$707
Net Assets53.66M
FTHF vs SM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHF vs. SM commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHF is a Buy and SM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SM: Fundamental Ratings
SM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTHF | SM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 17 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
More | ||||
SM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with NOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then NOG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y