Intraday BUY SELL Signals
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHF vs SLM
FTHF vs SLM Comparison
Open Charts FTHF vs SLM
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$37.52
Change-$1.14 (-2.95%)
Volume$372
Net Assets76.94M
FTHF vs SLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHF vs. SLM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHF is a Hold and SLM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLM: Fundamental Ratings
SLM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FTHF | SLM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 8 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.33% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||
SLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLM has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLM jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLM | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| SYF - SLM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| COF - SLM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| NAVI - SLM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| BFH - SLM | 71% Closely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| ENVA - SLM | 70% Closely correlated | -7.72% | ||
More | ||||